At InterGlobal Certification (IGC), our certification decision process is designed to ensure that every certificate we issue is based on objective evidence and a rigorous technical review. To maintain the highest level of impartiality, IGC ensures that the final decision to grant or refuse certification is made by a centralized team of subject matter experts who were not involved in the actual audit activities.
At the conclusion of an assessment, the appointed Lead Auditor prepares a comprehensive audit report. This report includes:
While the Lead Auditor provides the recommendation, they do not have the authority to grant the certificate.
Once the audit report is submitted, it undergoes a Technical Review by a centralized team of Subject Matter Experts (SMEs). This team reviews the file for:
Based on the Technical Review, IGC is responsible for making decisions relating to:
The client is formally notified of the decision. If certification is granted, the official certificate is issued. If certification is refused or suspended, IGC provides the client with a clear explanation of the reasons for the decision and the steps required for reconsideration.
All decision-makers operate under the oversight of the IGC Impartiality Committee. They must remain free from any commercial, financial, or personal pressures that could influence the outcome of a certification decision.
We uphold the highest standards of impartiality, transparency, and ethical conduct in all certification activities.
All certification decisions are made independently, free from commercial or external influence.
We maintain strict processes to identify, evaluate, and eliminate any potential conflicts of interest.
Our team follows globally recognized ethical guidelines to ensure fairness and transparency.
Our team is here to support you with certification guidance, compliance requirements, and policy clarifications.